Talk:U.S. Route 395 in Nevada

U.S. Roads: U.S. Highways / Nevada Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. Highways
Locations	Nevada
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Nevada (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles

State nav

For the state nav box at the bottom of the article, do we really need two links that link to California? Can't we link the previous state to California and the next state to Oregon? ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 00:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since it doesn't go from Nevada to Oregon, Oregon is incorrect. --NE2 00:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well neither does U.S. Route 395 in California uses a previous state of nevada; US 395's southern terminus is in Hesperia. ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 00:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment on talk:U.S. Route 395 in California. There is precedence on how to handle this and I link to 2 articles about Politicians who have served in the same office at 2 different times. IMO this doesn't have to be that hard. I think its at least worth consideringDavemeistermoab (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 00:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand, but what does IMO stand for? ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 01:19, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, IMO = In My Opinion. In reference to what I said on the California article NE was a reference to User:NE2, sorry I bungled the name, I was in a hurry when I typed that.Davemeistermoab (talk) 01:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Field mileposts

Since Nevada DOT doesn't post complete milepost logs, here are some mileposts observed in the field in/near Carson City. (* = MPs adjusted to new/proposed bypass mileage that does not currently correspond with the milepost book.)

0.56 - US 50 West
6.73 - College Pkwy intg*
8.03 - Arrowhead Dr intg*
8.46 - N. Carson St intg*
9.78 - CC/WA co line*
2.74 - Bellvue Rd

--LJ (talk) 20:24, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Future Interstate 580

Can someone mention future I-580's construction in the article?

Allen (talk) 21:28, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's certainly on my "to do" list--but this is not near the top, and it's a long list. My current focus has been in other areas, though... -- LJ ↗ 17:10, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

History section

An anon contributed a detailed and convoluted History section. I haven't checked any of this unsourced stuff for accuracy, but I did format it, add capital letters and periods at what I took to be ends of sentences, and such, so at least it sort of reads like English. Needs work. Dicklyon (talk) 03:54, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's been reverted as duplicative. There might have been some useful things in there, if sources could be found. Dicklyon (talk) 15:14, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your efforts, but I reverted the whole addition by the IP. It was a mess. Much of it was duplicative with Interstate 580 (Nevada), or irrelevant to this article, or speculation; and it wasn't comprehensive for the whole route. -- LJ ↗ 15:15, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]